Friday, March 5, 2010

QUEBEC OMBUDSMAN - POLICE CRIME NOT OUR JURISDICTION

 
 
 
 *************************
 
MONTREAL'S "PARTNERS IN CRIME" CONTINUE TO ENJOY THEIR ILL-GOTTEN GAINS WHILE THEIR VICTIMS MUST CONTINUE TO BATTLE FOR JUSTICE DAY AND NIGHT, YEAR AFTER YEAR - UNTIL THERE IS JUSTICE IN QUEBEC FOR CRIME VICTIMS.
 
Phyllis Carter
 
 
Received from THE QUEBEC OMBUDSMAN
March 5, 2010
 
Marie-Claude Ladouceur
Delegate of the Quebec Ombudsman
 
Re: Your emails to the Quebec Ombudsman
 
Mrs Carter,
 
Le Protecteur du citoyen (the Quebec Ombudsman) did receive the four emails you sent on February 16, 2010 regarding the events of October 7, 1996 where your were attacked and robbed.  In your emails you mention that "Montreal Police officer helped the thief and has been covering up ever since." You also ask for the Ombudsmans's help because you are "still fighting for the return of every precious thing that was stolen" from you and your family.
 
Unfortunately, the Quebec Ombudsman will not be able to help you regarding those events. The Ombudsman cannot intervene in respect of an act or omission of a police officer or a police body.
 
The mission of the Quebec Ombudsman is to make sure that the ministries and agencies of the Government of Québec and institutions in the health and social services network provide you with adequate services and respect your rights.
 
In the report released on February 16, 2010,  the Quebec Ombudsman decided to analyse the policy implemented by Ministère de la Sécurité publique when police officers are involved in incidents resulting in serious injury or death. For such events, the Quebec ombudsman decided to call into question the investigative procedure used to clarify the circumstances surrounding those incidents. This procedure, and consequently the Ombudsman's report, does not apply to regular police investigations nor to police ethic questions.
 
We are sorry that we are unable to assist you further.
 
Sincerely,
 
Marie-Claude Ladouceur
Delegate of the Quebec Ombudsman 
 
-------------------------------------------------------------

Destinataire :        protecteur@protecteurducitoyen.qc.ca,

<JenniM1@parl.gc.ca>, <Ignatieff...

Date :                       02/16/10 8:17 pm

Objet :                     MONTREAL POLICE COVER FOR THEIR OWN - FACEBOOK 

 

MONTREAL POLICE COVER  FOR THEIR OWN

 

FACEBOOK

February 16, 2010

 

_Jeanne To Thanh Hien_

(http://www.facebook.com/l.php?u=http://ca.news.yahoo.com/s/capress/100216/national/police_policing_themselves&h=f6d0b365693838498ff1c0

798a580398&ref=nf)  

 

_Police show bias when investigating other  cops:

tough report by Quebec official_

 

 (http://www.facebook.com/l.php?u=http://ca.news.yahoo.com/s/capress/100216/national/police_policing_themselves&h=f6d0b36569383849

8ff1c0798a580398&ref=nf)

ca.news.yahoo.com

 

MONTREAL ‑ A devastating report from a  provincial ombudsman says there's

little evidence police officers can fairly  investigate themselves. Quebec ombudsman Raymonde Saint‑Germain says she's  detected serious errors and signs of bias in cases where police are investigated  in that province. 

 

MONTREAL POLICE COVER FOR THEIR  OWN

 

February 16, 2010

 

To: The Quebec Ombudsman,  Raymonde St‑Germaine, 

protecteur@protecteurducitoyen.qc.ca

 

I have been begging for justice day  and night for thirteen years, since I

was attacked and robbed in my home at 4995  Prince of Wales, NDG, Montreal

on October 7, 1996.

 

A Montreal Police officer  helped the thief and the police have been

covering up ever since.

 

I am  now 73 years old and fighting cancer. I have very little energy, but I am still  fighting for the return of every precious thing that was stolen from me and from  my family by Dawn McSweeney and her "partners in crime."

 

All details  available at _http://dawnmcsweeney.blogspot.com

 

 

Phyllis  Carter

 

Tuesday, February 23, 2010

MONTREAL POLICE HELP PARTNERS IN CRIME -OLYMPIC SOUVENIRS

 
 
FACEBOOK
February 23, 2010
 
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000343040806&ref=mf  
 

PEOPLE ARE COLLECTING OLYMPIC SOUVENIRS:

DAWN MCSWEENEY AND HER "PARTNERS IN CRIME" STOLE ALL MY SOUVENIRS ALONG WITH ALL MY BEST JEWELLERY, MY WEDDING PORTRAIT, AND EVERYTHING LEFT TO ME BY MY BELOVED HUSBAND. 

A MONTREAL POLICE OFFICER HELPED THE THIEVES AND, TO THIS DAY, THE MONTREAL POLICE ARE COVERING UP.

MY BATTLE FOR JUSTICE CONTINUES DAY AND NIGHT.

For all the details of these crimes, see - http://dawnmcsweeney.blogspot.com

Tuesday, February 16, 2010

ALEX LAVERGNE ACCUSES DAWN'S MOTHER OF ROBBERY

JenniM1@parl.gc.ca, wwacity@hotmail.com, mcqueenp@videotron.ca, haubin@thegazette.canwest.com, pcherry@thegazette.canwest.com, editor@ndgfreepress.com, editor@thesuburban.com, ministre@justice.gouv.qc.ca, site_premier_ministre@mce.gouv.qc.ca, tommy.schnurmacher@cjad.com, jorchard@globaltv.com, ajelowicki@globaltv.com, psamuel@globaltv.com, tvanderheyden@ctv.ca

February 16, 2010

Once again, Alex Lavergne accuses Dawn McSweeney's mother, Debbie Rubin McSweeney of committing the robbery.

And still, the Montreal Police do nothing.

Phyllis Carter

http://dawnmcsweeney.blogspot.com/2010/01/alex-lavergne-accuses-dawn-mcsweeneys.html

Post a Comment On: DAWN MCSWEENEY

" MY FOREVER-BELOVED "BABY SISTER" DEBBIE MCSWEENEY"

Get past your insanity and realize that your "Forever-Beloved Baby Sister" isn't the angel you think she is.

Riddle me this: Who's the SOLE benifactor of your mother's will?

February 15, 2010 8:50 AM

Sunday, January 3, 2010

WHO IS LYING ? ALEX LAVERGNE ACCUSES DEBBIE MCSWEENEY OF THEFT

WHO IS LYING? THE MONTREAL POLICE ? ALEX LAVERGNE ? DEBBIE MCSWEENEY?

The Montreal Police told me that Dawn McSweeney and Alex Lavergne refused to take polygraph tests.

In a comment on my blog, Alex Lavergne says the police never asked them to take polygraph tests.

Who is lying, The Montreal Police or Alex Lavergne ?

Read all the details at
http://dawnmcsweeney.blogspot.com/

The Montreal Police also told me that they found "no fingerprints" on the empty cases and boxes that were finally returned to me by Dawn McSweeney and Debbie McSweeney in March, 1997. But they both handled those items and so did I. Of course there were fingerprints. The police lied about that. Did they also lie about the polygraph test ? And, if so, why ?

The criminals are still free.

How much of a role did the Montreal Police actually play in these crimes ?

ALEX LAVERGNE ACCUSES DEBBIE MCSWEENEY

Sunday, January 24, 2010

THE MONTREAL POLICE DO NOTHING

 
 
 
I am fighting for my life - and I am fighting for justice. 
 
BUT THE MONTREAL POLICE DO NOTHING.
 
FACEBOOK
 
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000343040806&ref=mf 
 
My name is Phyllis Carter. I am a Canadian journalist, a widow and a crime victim. I am fighting cancer and the Quebec-Canada INJUSTICE SYSTEM that tells me crime victims have no rights. I was attacked and robbed in my home. Montreal Police helped the thief. Without a lawyer, crime victims have nowhere to turn.
 
Phyllis Carter
 
See background below
 

Saturday, January 23, 2010

ALEX LAVERGNE ACCUSES DAWN MCSWEENEY'S MOTHER

WHO ARE THE "PARTNERS IN CRIME"
so named in Dawn McSweeney's own blog ?
 
ALEX LAVERGNE ACCUSES DAWN MCSWEENEY'S OWN MOTHER, MY FOREVER-BELOVED "BABY SISTER" DEBBIE MCSWEENEY .
Alex said...

I can only speak for myself in saying i am 100% sure I never was asked to take a lie detector.

Now quit looking every else and look at the most likely target. If you were to search your youngest sister's home, i'm sure you'd find all your missing items. Your sister stiole from you, not us.

WHO ARE THE "PARTNERS IN CRIME" ? 

ALEX LAVERGNE ACCUSES DAWN MCSWEENEY'S OWN MOTHER,

MY FOREVER-BELOVED "BABY SISTER", DEBBIE MCSWEENEY .

Alex said : I can only speak for myself in saying i am 100% sure I never was asked to take a lie detector.... If you were to search your youngest sister's home, i'm sure you'd find all your missing items. Your sister stiole from you, not us.

January 5, 2010 1:46 PM

http://dawnmcsweeney.blogspot.com/2010/01/alex-lavergne-accuses-dawn-mcsweeneys.html

.......................................................

My name is Phyllis Carter. I am a Canadian and I am a crime victim. I have been fighting for justice since October 7, 1996, when I was attacked in my home and robbed of everything I had worked for all my life and everything left to me by my beloved husband. I told the police immediately who had robbed me, but a Montreal Police officer helped the thieves and, since then, the police have refused again and again to act in this case.

At the Meet the Candidates assembly in NDG on October 7, 2008, Liberal Member of Parliament, Marlene Jennings, stated before all the candidates and the public, "Mrs. Carter's rights were violated three times".

The three violations.

1. In 1996, the Montreal Police refused to file a report of the initial robbery. They have continued to refuse to act ever since.

2. In 2007, immediately following the death of my mother, the same group of criminals obtained a court order accusing me of being insane and dangerous. I was released from hospital unconditionally as soon as the doctors found out what my accusers had done and why. After my mother's death, we learned that -

3. In 2005, the same group who call themselves "Partners in Crime" created a will in my mother's name when she was 92 years old and handicapped physically and mentally. My mother was kept in total isolation by these criminals for ten years - until her death. The sole beneficiaries of the 2005 will were the same people who robbed me and obtained the court order against me. Then it became clear why these criminals tried to discredit me and silence me.

Marlene Jennings was re-elected to Parliament on October 14, 2008. I am still waiting for Mrs. Jennings to take the appropriate actions in this case.

Phyllis Mass Carter

PARTNERS IN CRIME: A MATTER OF PUBLIC RECORD


On October 7, 1996, I was attacked and robbed in my parents' Montreal home, where I had been living for two years while recovering from breast cancer. At the beginning of October my teenage niece, Dawn McSweeney, and her boyfriend Alex had moved in with us. Within a week of Dawn's arrival, I was suddenly attacked for no apparent reason and without any warning. In shock, I managed to call 911.

One of the two officers who responded to my distress call 'helped' me out the door without as much as a coat. In front of my assailant, the officer told me that I must never return. This police officer's unilateral decision to evict me, forbidding me to return home, gave all my most precious belongings, and my aged parents' lives and property into the hands of Dawn McSweeney.

This action was taken without any investigation. There was no legal procedure. No hearing. No court procedure. No trial. No judgment. No background to support such an action. No justification. The officer just decided to do it. And then - he did not file a report.

Widowed, unemployed and fighting cancer, the Montreal Police abandoned me in the street alone, cold, homeless and destitute. My entire life was locked up behind me, in the hands of my teenage niece, Dawn McSweeney.
 
I pleaded with the police to file a report, to go to the house and see for themselves the proof of what I was saying. They refused again and again. For six months, the police refused repeatedly to file a report. At 60, I had to start life again - from scratch.

Quebec's Police Ethics Commissioner, Denis Racicot, wrote to me: "The police have large powers and vast authority .... The case is "definitively closed." Large powers - to help criminals? Vast authority - to rob widows ?

I appealed to Quebec Premier Jean Charest. He wrote to say that the theft of all my jewellery and the fruit of my life's work and the personal treasures my husband left to me, is "a civil matter of an unfortunate nature." Grand larceny is a civil matter ?

After the robbery, Dawn's mother, Debbie McSweeney, our youngest sister, obtained power of attorney from both my parents. Every other member of the family, social services, fire protection inspectors and even police detectives, were barred from my parents' home thereafter.

In April, 2004, the home of our youth looked like something out of an Alfred Hitchcock movie, doors and windows overgrown with dead vines. I called for help and learned that my mother had been removed from her home.
 
So I went to the police station to file a missing person report. The officer could not file a report - because Debbie, told him by telephone that she knew where mother was. To see your mother or get information about where or how she is, you have to file a civil suit. "But you will need a lawyer.
 
" But that would take months ! Can't the police check on my mother now ? Sorry.

The following is a matter of Public Record.

In June, 2007, we learned that our mother had died. She was buried on June 21, 2007 after being kept in total seclusion by Debbie and her associates from the day of the robbery.
 
Suddenly, on June 26, I started receiving hate mail and threats to drop the robbery case were posted on my blog. I reported that to the police immediately.
 
The next afternoon, June 27, two police officers came to my door with a court order to have me committed for a 30-day mental evaluation, accusing me of being insane and dangerous. I was released from the hospital unconditionally on June 29, 2007.

The Suburban newspaper carried that story in two parts,
on September 5, 2007 and on September 12, 2007.

The following is also a matter of Public Record.

Weeks later, I found out why a complete stranger wanted me silenced: My accuser, the mise en cause who applied for the court order, was one Kenneth Gregoire Prud'homme, a person I do not know and with whom I have never spoken.
 
This same Prud'homme is named as the liquidator of a will in my mother's name created when she was 92 years old, handicapped mentally and physically and had been totally under the physical control and influence of Debbie and this group for a decade.
 
Their will was notarized and executed, but OUR MOTHER DID NOT SIGN THAT WILL. All the children were included in the wills my parents had made. Only Debbie and Dawn McSweeney and Kenneth Gregoire Prud'homme benefit from the bizarre 2005 will.

Months later, I discovered Dawn McSweeney's own blog on the internet. The heading reads:

grasping at intangibles


Dedicated to partners in crime and kindred spirits.
Voyeurs and well wishers also welcome.

http://graspingatintangibles.blogspot.com/

In November, 2007, my Member of the Quebec National Assembly wrote an appeal to the Conseil de la Magistrature against the judge who condemned me with his court order in less than four minutes without ever seeing me or speaking to me and without any medical evidence, but based solely on the bizarre accusations made by a man I do not know and Debbie who had not spoken with me since 1997. The Conseil de la Magistrature of Quebec replied that the judge did nothing wrong.

I am now 73 years old. I have been fighting for justice in this case for thirteen years. I will never give up. I want to make it very clear that I will not accept money or "compensation" from anyone. I want my parents' true wills to be reinstated. I do not want anything from my parents' estate for myself. I want only what Dawn McSweeney and her associates stole from me. And I want the thieves tried in criminal court.

I am fighting for that rare and elusive treasure - JUSTICE !
I will not settle for anything less.

Phyllis Carter

Saturday, January 23, 2010

ALEX LAVERGNE ACCUSES DAWN MCSWEENEY'S MOTHER

 
 
WHO ARE THE "PARTNERS IN CRIME"
so named in Dawn McSweeney's own blog ?
 
ALEX LAVERGNE ACCUSES DAWN MCSWEENEY'S OWN MOTHER, MY FOREVER-BELOVED "BABY SISTER" DEBBIE MCSWEENEY .
Alex said...

I can only speak for myself in saying i am 100% sure I never was asked to take a lie detector.

Now quit looking every else and look at the most likely target. If you were to search your youngest sister's home, i'm sure you'd find all your missing items. Your sister stiole from you, not us.

Sunday, January 3, 2010

WHO IS LYING ? ALEX LAVERGNE ACCUSES DEBBIE MCSWEENEY OF THEFT

WHO IS LYING? THE MONTREAL POLICE ? ALEX LAVERGNE ? DEBBIE MCSWEENEY?

The Montreal Police told me that Dawn McSweeney and Alex Lavergne refused to take polygraph tests.

In a comment on my blog, Alex Lavergne says the police never asked them to take polygraph tests.

Who is lying, The Montreal Police or Alex Lavergne ?

Read all the details at http://dawnmcsweeney.blogspot.com/

The Montreal Police also told me that they found "no fingerprints" on the empty cases and boxes that were finally returned to me by Dawn McSweeney and Debbie Mcsweeney in March, 1997. But they both handled those items and so did I. Of course there were fingerprints. The police lied about that. Did they also lie about the polygraph test ? And, if so, why ?

The criminals are still free.

How much of a role did the Montreal Police actually play in these crimes ?

ALEX LAVERGNE ACCUSES DEBBIE MCSWEENEY

Friday, January 1, 2010

MY PARENTS CAN NOT REST IN PEACE

 
2010 IS DEDICATED TO TRUTH AND JUSTICE
 
My parents can not rest in peace because they died with Dawn McSweeney's lies on their hearts.
 
It is my mission to clean up the mess created by the "partners in crime".
 
Read all the details at http://dawnmcsweeney.blogspot.com
 
Dawn McSweeney
 
DAWN MCSWEENEY

Alex Lavergne
 
ALEX LAVERGNE
 
Ed McSweeney
 
ED MCSWEENEY