Sunday, July 10, 2011


As I have described in great detail the crimes committed by Dawn McSweeney and her self-professed "partners in crime", I have been scrupulous in ensuring the accuracy of every word in every report.

I hesitated to say that the Montreal Police who have aided and abetted Dawn McSweeney's crime from the day of the robbery, October 7, 1996 - a day that will live in infamy in our family - what I hesitated to say was that the Montreal Police involved in this case were corrupt. But I have been meticulous in ensuring that the use of that very word in this matter is accurate, precise and true.

What is the definition of the word " corruption" ?

There are many meanings suggested in various dictionaries. The ones that are applicable in this case include -

Abuse of public trust
Breach of faith

What the Montreal Police have not been in this case is -


To the thousands of people all over the world who are following my reports, I invite you to read the article below and see for yourselves what my family and I have been suffering all these years due - most of all - to the corruption in the Montreal Police department.


Friday, April 30, 2010

When I was attacked and robbed in my home at 4995 Prince of Wales, NDG, Montreal on October 7, 1996, I told the police immediately who had robbed me.
Instead of questioning the thief, the police took me out of my home and told me in front of my assailant that I must never go back to the house for any reason.
I was not allowed to take any of my belongings with me. I was left with my purse, my bible and a pair of brown pumps I had intended to wear at church that day.
The police left me alone in the street in front of the house without even a coat. Everything I owned was left in the house in the hands of Dawn McSweeney and her boyfriend, Alex Lavergne.
The Montreal Police refused to take my report saying that I had to be patient and everything would be returned to me. During the following months and years, the Montreal Police at the Mariette station in NDG refused again and again and again to file a report of the crime.
In March, 1997, everything was returned to me by Dawn McSweeney - except for all my valuables, everything I had worked for all my life, everything left to me by my beloved husband.
Dawn McSweeney had five months, day and night, to go through all my possessions and select the items she wanted. And she returned the rest - files, clothing, everything but my most precious personal possessions - including my wedding portrait and my husband's trademark grey Stetson fedora - and all my best jewellery and my husband's diamond ring and his onyx ring, and his New Jersey Deputy Sheriff's badge.
Dawn McSweeney stole what was most precious to me - and what was most valuable for her. Greed, hatred, jealousy, bigotry - all played a role in what she stole. Bigotry was the key that allowed Dawn McSweeney to rob me. It opened the door and allowed her in. It opened the door and had me removed from my home so that she was completely free to steal whatever she wanted.
When my empty cases were returned by Dawn McSweeney in mid-March, 1997, I brought all the empty little jewellery boxes and cases to the Montreal Police at the Mariette station. They finally started what appeared to be an investigation.
A police detective was assigned to the case. After I pleaded with her to recover my belongings from the house, she managed to get Dawn to return my winter coat. Nothing else. The police detective did not enter the house and made no effort to recover my belongings. She went to the door at 4995 Prince of Wales and Dawn handed her my borg coat.
The police told me they could not enter the house without a warrant. I asked them to get a warrant. They told me that judges will not issue a warrant unless they are absolutely sure that they would find the stolen goods. Catch 22 for crime victims who don't have an expensive lawyer to defend their rights. What rights? The police at the Mariette station told me that crime victims have no rights. Only the accused have rights.
Some time later, I received a tip that Dawn had a boyfriend who owned a jewellery store on Prince Arthur. When I gave that information to the detective, she told me to go and investigate myself as I had been a Pinkerton Investigator. I went out to Prince Arthur, and I wrote a report for the police.
And the Montreal Police did nothing. Were they incompetent ? Corrupt ? We don't give a damn ?
This is how the Montreal Police have treated this criminal case from the first day. And so I fight on - day and night - until the criminals are tried in criminal court and they return everything they have stolen.
For details and background, see
Posted by Phyllis Carter
Member of Parliament, Marlene Jennings,
stated at two public meetings in 2008,
"Mrs. Carter's rights were violated three times."
And now thousands of people around the world are reading about these crimes, aided and abetted by the Montreal Police. My battle for justice continues day and night. Dear reader, I welcome your interest and your support. Silence implies consent.
Let me be very clear about this: This is not a civil case. It is a criminal case. I am not seeking money or "compensation" of any kind. I want what is my own. I want back everything Dawn McSweeney stole from me. I want the authorities to return to my parents' children and grandchildren, everything that Dawn McSweeney and her partners in crime stole from them. And I want Dawn McSweeney in prison.
I want only what is my own.
I want justice.
I will not settle for less.

No comments: